[Vendor] JEEP six orders in, zero problems, and i am suspicious of my own luck
Right, the testing question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 24 data points over 20 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 36, not week 85. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Order date, product, and result, in that order please?
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
[removed by moderator]
the batch number or it did not happen
MKM order #2, Poland, no drama, receipts inside
Reship, credit, or they ghosted you? That matters.
the reship rate on QST is actually pretty consistent
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
Ordered from SWB, got the vial, tested it myself via VendorInvestigate, and it held the claim. Order fulfilled.
Ordered from SWB, got the vial, tested it myself via VendorInvestigate, and it held the claim.
Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 99.0% on the same vial is normal.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Reship experience: WXT asked for photos, processed it in 17 days, sent a replacement no questions. That is the template.
Reship experience: Homopeptide asked for photos, processed it in 14 days, sent a replacement no questions. That is the template.
Did you test the vial you received or are we going off the vendor COA?
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
the reship rate on QST is actually pretty consistent
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
TFC order #17, Canada, no drama, receipts inside
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
BCH three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 98.7% anyway, so no harm done.
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
Went through three vendors to find one that actually ships on-time and tests clean. The answer was Homopeptide.
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
Not to be pedantic but testing and reship are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
- 1Reship experience: Homopeptide asked for photos, processed it in 14 days,…11 comments in this branch · started by u/zeynep_duarte
- 2Order date, product, and result, in that order please?7 comments in this branch · started by u/nz_unfunded