530
[Country] SE/NO/DK — Norway is the outlier and not in a good way
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/compounding repeats that prescription is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I…
u/dario_petrescu
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Verona.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
10,945post karma
5,175comment karma
4submissions
57comments
comment on [Discussion] are the c/vendorvetting evidence rules too strict (no) in c/meta · 10 points · 5 days ago
moderation appeals go through modmail first
comment on [Country] SE/NO/DK — Norway is the outlier and not in a good way in c/glp1eu · 9 points · 9 days ago
tag your country in the title, bare EU gets a template
comment on [Country] SE/NO/DK — Norway is the outlier and not in a good way in c/glp1eu · 5 points · 9 days ago
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
comment on [Country] SE/NO/DK — Norway is the outlier and not in a good way in c/glp1eu · 12 points · 9 days ago
The constipation was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on [Long Term] found my lowest effective dose by going down, not up in c/maintenancephase · 27 points · 10 days ago
food noise returns but not always immediately
comment on [Discussion] "EU rules" is almost always a national question wearing a European hat in c/glp1eu · 8 points · 16 days ago
Which country? Rules differ.
comment on [Vendor] JEEP six orders in, zero problems, and i am suspicious of my own luck in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 16 days ago
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
comment on [Discussion] we have no vocabulary for success that is not a number going down in c/maintenancephase · 14 points · 17 days ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on [Discussion] should c/progresspics stay text-only forever (yes) in c/meta · 5 points · 19 days ago
Strongly agree. Transparency wins.
comment on why do vendor accounts always have the same three typos in c/vendorvetting · 13 points · 25 days ago
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
comment on goal weight — 18 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 0 points · 1 months ago
Regain on a taper is expected. 18% back over 12 weeks, which matches the discontinuation data. Planned for it.
comment on why does nobody talk about prescription in c/glp1eu · 1 points · 3 months ago
This is correct. Tag your country.
comment on [Results] 22 weeks, 45kg, and maintenance was the hard part in c/maintenancephase · 64 points · 3 months ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for moderation posts in c/meta · 1 points · 4 months ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
comment on why does nobody talk about testing in c/vendorvetting · 128 points · 4 months ago
Ordered from SGN, got the vial, tested it myself via VendorInvestigate, and it held the claim. Order fulfilled.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring vendor at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 5 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on three years of rules threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/meta · 26 points · 5 months ago
Strongly agree. Transparency wins.
comment on unpopular opinion: moderation is massively overrated in c/meta · 4 points · 6 months ago
This is correct. Modmail first.
comment on small win: order records stopped being a problem at week 21 in c/vendorvetting · 91 points · 6 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.