[Discussion] we are measuring vendor at the wrong time and calling it noise
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: PeptideMeter matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 8 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 29 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
Adding to this: Medutest is doing more work than the comment implies.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
Slight fix: the number was 99.1, not 93.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Ordered from WXT, got the vial, tested it myself via Janoshik, and it held the claim. Order fulfilled.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
Yeah, GL Biochem took 8 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
the reship rate on QST is actually pretty consistent
JEEP order #5, Ireland, no drama, receipts inside
JEEP order #5, Ireland, no drama, receipts inside
Adding to this: order records is doing more work than the comment implies.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
Yeah, ERP took 18 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
Yeah, ERP took 18 days and the material was flawless.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 83 weeks to accept.
JEEP order #5, Ireland, no drama, receipts inside
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
CPC took 2 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
CPC took 2 days to answer an email and the material was flawless.
Adding to this: testing is doing more work than the comment implies.
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
the reship rate on GL Biochem is actually pretty consistent
- 1JEEP order #5, Ireland, no drama, receipts inside10 comments in this branch · started by u/liv_dumitru
- 2referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions9 comments in this branch · started by u/tl_dr_tina