u/thermal_mass_tom

this is the most niche offer on the internet and i want to take you up on it

The specific failure here is almost certainly thermal mass rather than insulation. A single small pack in a large void has nothing to hold the temperature with; the pack exhausts and then the air in the box does whatever the outside is doing.

Two smaller packs plus a snugger void outperforms one bigger pack in a loose box, and it costs the same.

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

the other thing a logger shows you is your own fridge. i put one in mine for a week expecting to be smug and found 2.1°C at the back and 7.8°C in the door.

Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.

Stalled for 8 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 38.

Which trial arm?

nobody here can tell you what a result means for you

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

Not to be pedantic but order records and PeptideMeter are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

the MASH indication changes the risk calculus

resting heart rate moved up 20 bpm and settled back down when I stopped escalating

eGFR noise during rapid loss is expected

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

What are your reference ranges?

Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 98.3.

Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.

Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.