how many independent tests before you trust a vendor. my number is three
Week 55 update. 46kg down from the start, early fullness basically gone since about week 12.
Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with early fullness.
The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering, storing, logging, remembering. Nobody mentions that the hard bit is not the drug, it is the routine.
Happy to answer anything. Please do not ask me what dose you should be on.
best — the order this archive was captured in
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
the reship rate on HJ is actually pretty consistent
the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
[deleted]
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 2 weeks to accept.
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
Small correction: the trial was 5 weeks, not 26. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
the reship rate on FGP is actually pretty consistent
Went through three vendors to find one that actually ships on-time and tests clean. The answer was QYB.
WWB order #9, Australia, no drama, receipts inside
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
Order date, product, and result, in that order please?
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
QYB order #20, Canada, no drama, receipts inside
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
- 1Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell…8 comments in this branch · started by u/janoshik_junkie
- 2Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be…6 comments in this branch · started by u/thermal_mass_tom