GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] we are measuring vendor at the wrong time and calling it noise — 43 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.5k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 5 months ago by u/ipamorelin_i

[Discussion] we are measuring vendor at the wrong time and calling it noise

Discussionbranch of 9 comments

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: PeptideMeter matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 8 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 29 people measuring the…

Read the full submission and all 43 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 5 months ago
u/tl_dr_tina0 points·5 months ago

referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_petrov1 point·5 months ago

the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

replysharereportpermalink
u/naomi_ekstrom1 point·5 months ago·edited

the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

Adding to this: Medutest is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/cormac_pereira-34 points·5 months ago

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

replysharereportpermalink
u/janoshik_junkieindependent tester1 point·5 months ago

Slight fix: the number was 99.1, not 93.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lane_map_larrylogistics1 point·5 months ago

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_petrescu1 point·5 months ago

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ipamorelin_iOP1 point·5 months ago

Ordered from WXT, got the vial, tested it myself via Janoshik, and it held the claim. Order fulfilled.

replysharereportpermalink
u/pavel_kravchenko1 point·5 months ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.