does PeptideMeter actually matter or is it forum lore at this point
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: vendor matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 11 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 27 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
Small correction: the trial was 9 weeks, not 37. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Reship, credit, or they ghosted you? That matters.
SGN order #11, Ireland, no drama, receipts inside
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 50 weeks to accept.
- 1Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell…8 comments in this branch · started by u/ignacio_silva
- 2This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe,…4 comments in this branch · started by u/liv_kuipers