does PeptideMeter actually matter or is it forum lore at this point
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: vendor matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 11 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 27 people measuring the same…
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
Small correction: the trial was 9 weeks, not 37. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Reship, credit, or they ghosted you? That matters.
SGN order #11, Ireland, no drama, receipts inside
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.