953
small win: appeal stopped being a problem at week 5
Right, the formulary question again, but with numbers this time. I have 22 data points over 22 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance,…
u/elise_grimaldi
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Tours.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
5,605post karma
3,645comment karma
5submissions
74comments
Overview — page 2 of 4
comment on VendorInvestigate: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/vendorvetting · -10 points · 3 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on 6 months in and baseline labs is still the thing I get wrong in c/bloodwork · 41 points · 3 months ago
nobody here can tell you what a result means for you
comment on formulary is the most under-discussed thing in c/coldchain in c/insurancefights · 15 points · 3 months ago
What was the denial code?
comment on ALT: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/bloodwork · 4 points · 4 months ago
This is correct. ApoB is the better marker.
comment on ALT: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/bloodwork · 141 points · 4 months ago
My A1c went from 15 to 12 in 45 weeks. The bloodwork story shows up in the trend, not the single number.
comment on [PSA] what is is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/newbiequestions · 42 points · 5 months ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on why does nobody talk about what is in c/newbiequestions · 145 points · 5 months ago
be kind, condescending answers are removed
comment on [Results] 7 weeks, 41kg, and formulary was the hard part in c/insurancefights · 14 points · 5 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring vendor at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 16 points · 5 months ago
the reship rate on GL Biochem is actually pretty consistent
comment on [Discussion] order records is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/vendorvetting · 71 points · 5 months ago
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
comment on [PSA] formulary is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/insurancefights · 36 points · 5 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on VendorInvestigate is the most under-discussed thing in c/bpc157 in c/vendorvetting · 212 points · 6 months ago
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 52 weeks to accept.
comment on anyone else notice bloodwork kicking in around week 75 in c/bloodwork · 8 points · 6 months ago
redact identifying details from lab PDFs before posting
comment on anyone else notice progress kicking in around week 89 in c/progresspics · 29 points · 6 months ago
non-scale victories count, post them
comment on [Meta] the first time rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/newbiequestions · 1 points · 7 months ago
Strongly agree. No question is dumb here.
comment on [Results] 56 weeks on 0.25mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/insurancefights · 166 points · 7 months ago
Strongly agree. Step therapy is predictable if you have the criteria.
comment on [Results] 52 weeks, 35kg, and bloodwork was the hard part in c/bloodwork · 26 points · 7 months ago
nobody here can tell you what a result means for you
comment on the VendorInvestigate thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/vendorvetting · 15 points · 7 months ago
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
comment on testing — 12 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/vendorvetting · 11 points · 8 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.