u/elise_ramos
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Galway.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #21 — France, 39 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/labresults · 378 points · 1 year ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on someone explain goal to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/progresspics · 39 points · 1 year ago
include timeframe and starting point or it is a brag with no info
comment on someone explain goal to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/progresspics · -22 points · 1 year ago
no commenting on anybody's body, comment on the process
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify batch in c/labresults · 35 points · 1 year ago
the Medutest and PeptideMeter results differ by 23 points, both inside inter-lab variance
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on the API source question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/compounding · 211 points · 1 year ago
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
comment on test results — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/labresults · 509 points · 1 year ago
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
comment on someone explain progress to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/progresspics · 5 points · 1 year ago
Which country? Half the answers in this thread only apply in Germany.
comment on Denmark: UK, and what it actually costs here in c/glp1uk · 349 points · 1 year ago
private 2.4mg is NHS in the Netherlands this month
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring telehealth at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/compounding · 9 points · 2 years ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for long term posts in c/maintenancephase · 152 points · 2 years ago
the plateau is where the learning happens
comment on switched from 7.5mg to 15mg and the the food-noise thing got better, not worse in c/labresults · -20 points · 2 years ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on the milestone thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/progresspics · 76 points · 2 years ago
This is correct. Process matters more than the number.
comment on goal weight is the most under-discussed thing in c/trialwatch in c/maintenancephase · 1 points · 2 years ago
regain after taper is expected, plan for it
comment on [Results] 91 weeks on 0.25mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/labresults · 87 points · 2 years ago
Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 94.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on my ApoB moved and I cannot work out whether 503A is why in c/compounding · 88 points · 2 years ago
API source questions are on-topic and compounders dodging them is newsworthy
comment on 24 months in and lowest effective dose is still the thing I get wrong in c/maintenancephase · 56 points · 2 years ago
state how long you have been at maintenance, week 18 is not maintenance
comment on [Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on UK in c/glp1uk · 2 points · 2 years ago
NHS tier 3 is MHRA, the waiting list is real
comment on lowest effective dose — 4 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 113 points · 2 years ago
dose-stretching experiences welcome, dose-stretching instructions are not
comment on is it normal to get early fullness at week 15 in c/labresults · 40 points · 2 years ago
SWB product, Medutest test, 97.9% result, batch 2, 34 days in transit. Logged.
comment on is it normal to get early fullness at week 15 in c/labresults · 52 points · 2 years ago
My Janoshik result matched the vendor COA exactly, which is rare. FGP deserves that note in the directory.