u/freya_onwuka

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

Batch 15 appeared on CPC, SWB, and CPC claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.

DEXA twice yearly is the pattern

Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.

The Janoshik and Medutest numbers on the same vial from JEEP came back 97.6% and 97.9%. Both are right, inter-lab variance is real.

Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.

dosing errors come from people reconstituting two vials differently and forgetting which is which

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

i am begging people to write down the concentration

the 33 A1c trend is the answer

Batch 11 appeared on SGN, KP, and SGN claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.

escrow for group buys is standard, use it

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with chargeback, not with what you concluded.

a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so

never post a calculation as advice without stating the concentration

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 66 weeks to accept.

swirl, do not shake, or you are courting oxidation

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.