GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
3.5k
c/scamalerts·posted 2 years ago by u/pavel_nkemelu

anyone else notice exit scam kicking in around week 75

Confirmed Receipts ×1 Well Actually ×2 Slow Clap ×3

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.

The claim: scam matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 2 months without either producing anything.

What would actually settle it is 23 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.

If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.

4,488 up / 1,034 down81% upvoted29 commentsid 1nf6ge9 Jul 2024

29 comments

10 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/ignacio_silva800 points·2 years ago

This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.

replysharereportpermalink
u/aleksi_marchand382 points·2 years ago

Dated screenshot or is this from memory?

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →
u/freya_onwuka437 points·2 years ago

Batch 11 appeared on SGN, KP, and SGN claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.

replysharereportpermalink
u/mei_cardoso127 points·2 years ago

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/pavel_nkemeluOP79 points·2 years ago

PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (4) →
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/scamalerts
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/scam_taxonomyu/coa_forgery_watchu/whois_wandau/sock_puppet_spotter
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →