anyone else notice exit scam kicking in around week 75
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: scam matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 2 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 23 people measuring the same thing…
Batch 11 appeared on SGN, KP, and SGN claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
Small correction: the trial was 17 weeks, not 26. Does not change your point but people will quote it.