Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/glp1uk repeats that method development is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when…
u/hplc_hobbyist
Bought a second-hand HPLC and a lifetime of regret. I post chromatograms, not conclusions.
long-standing contributor · runs their own column · joined 21 Aug 2023
Overview — page 3 of 5
comment on three years of packaging threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coldchain · 54 points · 4 months ago
data logger is the standard, gut feeling is not
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on my triglycerides moved and I cannot work out whether tendon is why in c/bpc157 · 37 points · 4 months ago
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
comment on unpopular opinion: chromatogram is massively overrated in c/hplc · 10 points · 4 months ago
Detection wavelength? purity and that changes at different wavelengths.
comment on France: chromatogram, and what it actually costs here in c/hplc · 162 points · 4 months ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on week 31 check-in — 6kg down, constipation manageable, one thing confusing me in c/bpc157 · 7 points · 5 months ago
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
comment on the Netherlands: purity, and what it actually costs here in c/hplc · 19 points · 6 months ago
Strongly agree. Largest single impurity tells a different story than total purity.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about lyophilised until somebody posts a number in c/coldchain · 163 points · 6 months ago
lane reports need origin, destination, carrier, and actual transit days
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for co-agonism posts in c/cagrilintide · 27 points · 6 months ago
CagriSema is a fixed combo in trials, not user-mixed
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on integration in c/hplc · 54 points · 6 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on integration in c/hplc · 102 points · 6 months ago
the detector wavelength matters more than people think
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on integration in c/hplc · 75 points · 6 months ago
The related substances profile is way more interesting than the main peak %. A 98% with 12 peaks is different from a 98% that is one 38% impurity.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for co-agonism posts in c/cagrilintide · 97 points · 6 months ago
tendon and cagrilintide literature in rodents is interesting
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about handling in c/researchpeptides · 17 points · 7 months ago
regulatory status varies by country, check yours
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about handling in c/researchpeptides · 34 points · 7 months ago
Did anything else change in the same window?
comment on the denial question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/insurancefights · 4 points · 7 months ago
redact member ids and group numbers from every screenshot
comment on does LC-MS actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/hplc · 7 points · 7 months ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on LC-MS in c/hplc · 125 points · 7 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on rodent data: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/bpc157 · 53 points · 8 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on [Lab] 24th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/hplc · 175 points · 8 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.