GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
1.2k
c/bpc157·posted 4 months ago by u/meal_prep_mira

my triglycerides moved and I cannot work out whether tendon is why

Sceptic Receipts ×9 Well Actually ×1

Week 5 update. 16kg down from the start, reflux basically gone since about week 57.

Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with reflux.

The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering, storing, logging, remembering. Nobody mentions that the hard bit is not the drug, it is the routine.

Happy to answer anything. Please do not ask me what dose you should be on.

1,182 up / 25 down98% upvoted42 commentsid 11hrmf23 Mar 2026

42 comments

22 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/neha_falk112 points·4 months ago

Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_bakken90 points·4 months ago·edited

tendon and rodent data literature in rodents is interesting

replysharereportpermalink
u/piotr_grimaldi26 points·4 months ago

This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/incretin_ivypharmacology70 points·4 months ago

research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions

replysharereportpermalink
u/meal_prep_mira48 points·4 months ago

sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence

replysharereportpermalink
u/mod_cold_roommod · c/coldchain-34 points·4 months ago

Small correction: the trial was 14 weeks, not 13. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]1 point·4 months ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/ahmed_okafor127 points·4 months ago

This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anya_erdogan65 points·4 months ago

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dose_diary_danalog keeper36 points·4 months ago

regulatory status changed in 14 countries, check yours

replysharereportpermalink
u/hplc_hobbyistruns their own column37 points·4 months ago

My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bpc_scepticMOD28 points·4 months ago

Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.

replysharereportpermalink
u/elodie_yilmaz29 points·4 months ago·edited

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/food_noise_gonemaintenance10 points·4 months ago·edited

the pentadecapeptide rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_fonseca6 points·4 months ago

BPC pentadecapeptide is a naming problem, three things are called this

replysharereportpermalink
u/signe_villalobos5 points·4 months ago

Slight fix: the number was 98.4, not 98.3. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/katrin_girard4 points·4 months ago

the tendon literature looks promising but rodent-only

replysharereportpermalink
u/chain_confirm_cpayments20 points·4 months ago

The reflux was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.

replysharereportpermalink
u/meal_prep_miraOP15 points·4 months ago

Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.

replysharereportpermalink
u/signe_villalobos7 points·4 months ago

BPC pentadecapeptide is a naming problem, three things are called this

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_trevino8 points·4 months ago

sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence

replysharereportpermalink
u/incretin_ivypharmacology10 points·4 months ago

This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/bpc157

BPC-157 as it actually is: a pentadecapeptide with a genuinely interesting rodent tendon-and-gut literature, near-zero controlled human data, a naming and sequence mess in the supply chain, and a regulatory status that changed sharply in several countries.

35kmembers
62submissions
Mar 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/bpc157 rules
  1. Research use only. No human protocols, no injection instructions.
  2. Rodent data must be labelled as rodent data in the body.
  3. Sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.