u/kasper_cabrera

lowest effective dose is lowest effective dose, find it or stay higher

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 97.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

Cosigning the evidence standard.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 63 weeks to accept.

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

the carve-out clause varies by employer

hypoglycaemia risk when stacked with A1c

Yeah, maintenance is the boring part and the important part.

Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

Did you get step therapy or outright denial?

vendor staff must self-identify, full stop

state how long you have been at maintenance, week 3 is not maintenance

the 92 A1c trend is the answer

the weight-loss conversation drowns out glycaemic control sometimes

hypoglycaemia risk when stacked with metformin

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

Yeah, the denial code matters, it tells you what to fight.

Reship, credit, or they ghosted you? That matters.