u/lina_novak
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Porto.
member · joined 11 Feb 2025
Comments — page 4 of 4
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about rodent data in c/bpc157 · 34 points · 1 year ago
rodent data must be labelled as rodent data
comment on someone explain method development to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/hplc · -20 points · 1 year ago
A shoulder on the main peak that 24 analysts integrated 31 different ways. Same trace, 99.1 spread.
comment on [Discussion] LC-MS is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/hplc · 130 points · 1 year ago
co-elution is real and method development is usually not enough to resolve it
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on non-peptide in c/orforglipron · 151 points · 1 year ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on goal weight — 16 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · 23 points · 1 year ago
the regain question changes at maintenance
comment on goal weight — 16 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/maintenancephase · -21 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, maintenance is the boring part and the important part.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring USDC at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/cryptopay · 153 points · 1 year ago
escrow for group buys is standard, use it
comment on Germany: escrow, and what it actually costs here in c/cryptopay · 2 points · 2 years ago
Stablecoin or other?
comment on small win: dose stretching stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/maintenancephase · -37 points · 2 years ago
How long at maintenance?
comment on [Vendor] QST order #16 — Denmark, 23 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/cryptopay · 87 points · 2 years ago
Slight fix: the number was 97.2, not 97.4. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on tried sequence for 24 weeks. here is what happened. in c/bpc157 · 29 points · 2 years ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on small win: chargeback stopped being a problem at week 56 in c/cryptopay · 41 points · 2 years ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on the integration thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/hplc · 291 points · 2 years ago
two labs, two different baselines, two different purity numbers, both honest
comment on long term vs lowest effective dose — genuinely asking which matters more in c/maintenancephase · 34 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, maintenance is the boring part and the important part.
comment on [Results] 52 weeks, 35kg, and integration was the hard part in c/hplc · 1 points · 2 years ago
two labs, two different baselines, two different purity numbers, both honest