u/marit_sandvik

the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

Strongly agree. tier 3 is region-specific.

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.

the tendon literature looks promising but rodent-only

regulatory status changed in 8 countries, check yours

handlers in the community are rare and cautious

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

Not to be pedantic but order records and PeptideMeter are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

WWB ships from Denmark, arrival is 21 to 38 days on average

Australia to Australia: TFC with 24 days is the average, variance is 21

handlers in the community are rare and cautious

What was the trial arm you are quoting from? SURMOUNT-1, -2, -3 are all different.

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

private prescription routes vary by region

the 15mg is the top of the pen, not the required dose

Small correction: the trial was 21 weeks, not 3. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

the appetite change on tirz is more than just reduced hunger, it is different machinery

Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.