u/marta_vanhecke

Did you actually measure heart rate or is that a feeling?

copay is separate from coverage

external review is the appeal after insurance says no

This is correct. Appeal letters work.

the batch number or it did not happen

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

The glucagon component does different things than dual agonism. The fatigue are not just amplified versions.

triple agonism is phase 2, do not generalise

Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.

resubmission after denial requires new documentation

Yeah, WWB took 21 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

Mechanistically the bit that matters is Medutest. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.

one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread

Which trial arm and what was the n?

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial

prior auth criteria are state-specific, formulary differs

redact member ids and group numbers from every screenshot

order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.