u/rekha_vestergaard

prior auth criteria are state-specific, denial differs

What was the denial code?

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

Small correction: the trial was 19 weeks, not 36. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

The injection was scarier than the what is itself. 11 seconds and I was shocked it was the easiest part.

copay is separate from coverage

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy

the week one question is not dumb

The JEEP lane used to be 8 days, now averaging 24. Carrier change or route congestion, unclear.

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

denial reason codes matter, ask for the actual code

say which country and which plan type

Adding to this: copay is doing more work than the comment implies.

customs clearance often adds 8 days, factor that in

packaging quality matters on the 6-hour segments

phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers, cite the trial

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

Slight fix: the number was 99.0, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.