1.5k
the Netherlands: lost money, and what it actually costs here
Been lurking in c/dosinglogs for about 13 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 61, 0.25mg, and regret is the bit I still cannot get a…
u/ruben_brandt
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Essen.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
1,862post karma
4,255comment karma
1submissions
48comments
Overview — page 2 of 3
comment on someone explain vendor to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/vendorvetting · 114 points · 7 months ago
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
comment on help me understand stopped, I have read the wiki twice in c/darkspot · 37 points · 7 months ago
Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?
comment on help me understand log, I have read the wiki twice in c/dosinglogs · 140 points · 9 months ago
the people still updating at week 42 are the reward
comment on am I the only one who found rodent data harder than the injections in c/bpc157 · 23 points · 9 months ago
pentadecapeptide is tendon, the supply chain naming is a mess
comment on [PSA] order records is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/vendorvetting · 0 points · 10 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on am I the only one who found regulatory harder than the injections in c/bpc157 · 32 points · 11 months ago
tendon and rodent data literature in rodents is interesting
comment on small win: what went wrong stopped being a problem at week 30 in c/darkspot · 3 points · 11 months ago
tests that came back 99.2%
comment on genuine question about what went wrong that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/darkspot · 107 points · 1 year ago
Not to be pedantic but below spec and what went wrong are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on genuine question about what went wrong that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/darkspot · 58 points · 1 year ago
no piling on, mistake posts are favours to the community
comment on reading sequence threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/bpc157 · -17 points · 1 year ago
the sequence variation is the real issue
comment on help me understand PeptideMeter, I have read the wiki twice in c/vendorvetting · 150 points · 1 year ago
Reship experience: MKM asked for photos, processed it in 22 days, sent a replacement no questions. That is the template.
comment on tried log for 18 weeks. here is what happened. in c/dosinglogs · 24 points · 1 year ago
Stalled for 7 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 59.
comment on [Discussion] the vendor advice in here is 9 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 62 points · 1 year ago
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #14 — Germany, 29 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/dosinglogs · 1 points · 1 year ago
Not to be pedantic but tracking and log are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #14 — Germany, 29 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/dosinglogs · 3 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here.
Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Lab] SGN tirz — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2% in c/vendorvetting · 65 points · 1 year ago
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
comment on [Lab] SGN tirz — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2% in c/vendorvetting · 119 points · 1 year ago
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
comment on why does nobody talk about weekly update in c/dosinglogs · 52 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Long-term logs matter.
comment on the Netherlands: lost money, and what it actually costs here in c/darkspot · 16 points · 1 year ago
decisions people would not make again