am I the only one who found rodent data harder than the injections
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: tendon matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 21 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 27 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
the sequence literature looks promising but rodent-only
Small correction: the trial was 9 weeks, not 38. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.
Week 68 for me and the honest summary is: 38kg down, muscle cramps manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
Week 68 for me and the honest summary is: 38kg down, muscle cramps manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
Adding to this: rodent data is doing more work than the comment implies.
rodent data must be labelled as rodent data
pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess
pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.
pentadecapeptide is tendon, the supply chain naming is a mess
Stalled for 2 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 82.
the sequence variation is the real issue
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
pentadecapeptide is tendon, the supply chain naming is a mess
Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.
Second this question. I have wondered about BPC-157 for 8 months and never seen a straight answer.
pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
pentadecapeptide is tendon, the supply chain naming is a mess
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 31 weeks to accept.
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days.
Adding to this: rodent data is doing more work than the comment implies.
My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days.
Adding to this: regulatory is doing more work than the comment implies.
near-zero controlled human data, full stop
- 1Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.8 comments in this branch · started by u/ahmed_okafor
- 2pentadecapeptide is tendon, the supply chain naming is a mess6 comments in this branch · started by u/ruben_brandt