u/santiago_szabo
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Utrecht.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Comments — page 2 of 4
comment on does A1c actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/bloodwork · 35 points · 5 months ago
ApoB over LDL-C, that is the hierarchy
comment on nobody warned me about nausea and I would have liked the warning in c/coa · 108 points · 5 months ago
chromatogram or it did not happen
comment on nobody warned me about nausea and I would have liked the warning in c/coa · 441 points · 5 months ago
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
comment on stalled for 22 weeks at 1.0mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 1 points · 6 months ago
post the whole document, not the headline number
comment on anyone else notice water content kicking in around week 39 in c/coa · 1 points · 7 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 22 weeks, not 34. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on anyone else notice water content kicking in around week 39 in c/coa · 0 points · 7 months ago
the method line is doing real work, not just window dressing
comment on anyone else notice water content kicking in around week 39 in c/coa · 51 points · 7 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on the COA thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/coa · 71 points · 7 months ago
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.
comment on someone explain non-scale victory to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/progresspics · 49 points · 7 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on the Netherlands: area percent, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 19 points · 8 months ago
Tested the GLB raw material and a reseller vial side-by-side. Same purity claim, different impurity profiles. Handling matters.
comment on the Netherlands: area percent, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 45 points · 8 months ago
Tested the GLB raw material and a reseller vial side-by-side. Same purity claim, different impurity profiles. Handling matters.
comment on the Netherlands: area percent, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 128 points · 8 months ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on is it normal to get injection-site soreness at week 54 in c/glp1canada · 6 points · 9 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 17 weeks, not 3. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on what changed for me between week 45 and week 88 in c/coa · 50 points · 9 months ago
chromatogram or it did not happen
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Results] 82 weeks, 15kg, and progress was the hard part in c/progresspics · 1 points · 9 months ago
non-scale victories count, post them
comment on Canada vs formulary — genuinely asking which matters more in c/glp1canada · 69 points · 11 months ago
The muscle cramps was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on [Discussion] the purity advice in here is 9 years out of date in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
comment on purity: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/coa · 24 points · 1 year ago
post the whole document, not the headline number
comment on [Results] 96 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/coa · 52 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
comment on [Results] 96 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/coa · 122 points · 1 year ago
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.