what changed for me between week 45 and week 88
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 0.5mg to 12.5mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 15 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have early fullness I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 17 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
What were the related substances listed individually?
the method line is doing real work, not just window dressing
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
post the whole document, not the headline number
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
chromatogram or it did not happen
chromatogram or it did not happen
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
chromatogram or it did not happen
chromatogram or it did not happen
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
Strongly agree.
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
chromatogram or it did not happen
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
axis labels included, always
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
- 1What were the related substances listed individually?7 comments in this branch · started by u/karma_irrelevant
- 2Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone…5 comments in this branch · started by u/aurel_boateng