u/solene_abubakar

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

What are you comparing it against though?

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

lyophilised powder is far more forgiving than reconstituted solution

the logger trace is the data that matters, not the packaging promises

decisions people would not make again

This is correct. Dry powder is way more robust than liquid.

private plan is the cross-province difference

Adding to this: private plan is doing more work than the comment implies.

excursion claims need a logger trace or a photo at unboxing, not "it felt warm"

excursion claims need a logger trace or a photo at unboxing, not "it felt warm"

Disagree on that part. 99.0% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

no dose recommendations for individuals, even here

Customs clearance took 16 days. Package sat unrefrigerated during that. Powder tested clean after, reconstituted solution probably would not have.

France to France: 6 days with BCH and 31 days with HJ. Same route, different carriers, variance is real.

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

Strongly agree. Provincial variation is real.

The research community is small on cagrilintide. Forum lore changes faster than data.

lane reports need origin, destination, carrier, and actual transit days

Reconstituted or dry powder?

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 92 weeks to accept.

is this normal week 14 — yes, probably