u/solene_eriksen
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Tampere.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Comments — page 2 of 5
comment on PeptideMeter vs VendorInvestigate — genuinely asking which matters more in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 3 months ago
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
comment on PeptideMeter vs VendorInvestigate — genuinely asking which matters more in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 3 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on PeptideMeter vs VendorInvestigate — genuinely asking which matters more in c/vendorvetting · -3 points · 3 months ago
Tested 21 batches from TFC over 5 weeks. The consistency is the signal. They claim 98, they deliver 98.
comment on [Results] 87 weeks, 25kg, and special authorization was the hard part in c/glp1canada · 10 points · 3 months ago
Australia here. Waited 17 months on a list, gave up, went private, and the total cost was roughly what I expected.
comment on [Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on testing in c/vendorvetting · -20 points · 3 months ago
This order history matches mine almost exactly.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on [Question] 503A — what am I missing here in c/compounding · 15 points · 3 months ago
no pharmacy referral codes, naming is fine, recruiting is not
comment on unpopular opinion: state board is massively overrated in c/compounding · 26 points · 4 months ago
the Poland situation is different from the US, different regulations
comment on genuine question about Medutest that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/vendorvetting · 8 points · 4 months ago
Is that a Janoshik result or are you quoting the vendor COA?
comment on genuine question about Medutest that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/vendorvetting · 9 points · 4 months ago
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
comment on genuine question about Medutest that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/vendorvetting · 307 points · 4 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on genuine question about Medutest that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 4 months ago
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
comment on why does nobody talk about API source in c/compounding · 43 points · 4 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 10 weeks, not 25. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on week 21 check-in — 37kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/insurancefights · 1 points · 5 months ago
say which country and which plan type
comment on week 21 check-in — 37kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/insurancefights · 100 points · 5 months ago
redact member ids and group numbers from every screenshot
comment on VendorInvestigate is the most under-discussed thing in c/bpc157 in c/vendorvetting · 248 points · 5 months ago
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
comment on my eGFR moved and I cannot work out whether province is why in c/glp1canada · 2 points · 6 months ago
special auth turnaround is province-specific
comment on genuine question about Canada that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1canada · 2 points · 6 months ago
special authorization is the cross-province difference
comment on someone explain vendor to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/vendorvetting · 105 points · 7 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Meta] the prior authorization rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/insurancefights · 4 points · 8 months ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on unpopular opinion: formulary is massively overrated in c/insurancefights · 4 points · 8 months ago
This is correct. Appeal letters work.