610
Denmark: dual agonist, and what it actually costs here
Been lurking in c/t2dglp1 for about 9 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 26, 0.25mg, and hepatic fat is the bit I still cannot get a…
u/whois_wanda
Domain registered eleven days ago and already has 400 five-star reviews. Interesting.
member · joined 16 Aug 2024
5,558post karma
8,752comment karma
7submissions
158comments
Overview — page 5 of 5
comment on fake COA: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/scamalerts · 110 points · 8 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on 20 months in and half-life is still the thing I get wrong in c/glp1science · 16 points · 9 months ago
Yeah, the incretin mechanism is doing the work here.
comment on Denmark: dual agonist, and what it actually costs here in c/survodutide · -24 points · 9 months ago
the MASH indication changes the risk calculus
comment on week 76 check-in — 12kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/labresults · 173 points · 10 months ago
the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 19 points, both inside inter-lab variance
comment on genuine question about scam that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/scamalerts · 86 points · 10 months ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring MASH at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/survodutide · 4 points · 11 months ago
do not generalise from tirzepatide
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on test results: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/labresults · 63 points · 11 months ago
Tracking number removed.
Disagree on that part. 99.1% and 99.2% on the same vial is normal.
comment on test results: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/labresults · 116 points · 11 months ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on three years of cloned site threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/scamalerts · 134 points · 11 months ago
evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test
comment on the appeal question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/insurancefights · 214 points · 11 months ago
External review overturned the denial. Took 18 weeks but the process exists.
comment on the appeal question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/insurancefights · 28 points · 11 months ago
Copay was external review for the copay then another 22% of the total. Read the actual plan document.
comment on the appeal question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/insurancefights · 144 points · 11 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
2.7k
the appeal question that gets asked weekly, answered properly
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking denial against ApoB for 39 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than…
comment on help me understand endpoint, I have read the wiki twice in c/trialwatch · 31 points · 12 months ago
event rates are more informative than hazard ratios alone
comment on stalled for 18 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/labresults · 25 points · 1 year ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on stalled for 2 weeks at 1.7mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/scamalerts · 11 points · 1 year ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on appetite: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/glp1science · 330 points · 1 year ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on unpopular opinion: orforglipron is massively overrated in c/orforglipron · 70 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. ATTAIN data is phase 11.
comment on someone explain seizure to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/customs · -10 points · 1 year ago
the Canada import rules are specific to Canada