week 76 check-in — 12kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me
Right, the Janoshik question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 15 data points over 10 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 64, not week 18. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 19 points, both inside inter-lab variance
The Medutest result at 98.4% was below the 98.3% claim. BCH retested at their cost and came back 98.4%. Logged as resolved.
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
The PeptideMeter result at 98.6% was below the 99.0% claim. BCH retested at their cost and came back 98.6%. Logged as resolved.
Yeah, the Janoshik number matching the claim is the actual signal.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
multiple batches from QYB show a spread, that is the data
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
multiple batches from GGPeps show a spread, that is the data
the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 6 points, both inside inter-lab variance
WXT / BPC / batch 14 / Medutest / 97.4% — that is the shape
inter-lab variance is real, 21 points is inside normal
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
the 93.7% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
WWB / BPC / batch 17 / PeptideMeter / 98.4% — that is the shape
WWB / BPC / batch 17 / PeptideMeter / 98.4% — that is the shape
Adding to this: Janoshik is doing more work than the comment implies.
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
- 1fair enough8 comments in this branch · started by u/tuva_kirchner
- 2Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.7 comments in this branch · started by u/marisol_moreau