306
shortage: what the trials say vs what this community says
Quick one. Canada here. Australia works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given…
u/liv_nkemelu
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Kaunas.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
16,946post karma
5,866comment karma
8submissions
78comments
comment on [Explainer] area% is not mass% and here is exactly why it matters in c/coa · 3 points · 5 days ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
Adding to this: related substances is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Discussion] AU and NZ get lumped together and the systems are nothing alike in c/glp1aus · 2 points · 7 days ago
AU or NZ?
comment on [TGA] shortage notice archive, worth bookmarking in c/glp1aus · 12 points · 9 days ago
Yeah, the 2024 rule change was sudden.
comment on water content is on the COA and everyone skips it in c/coa · 29 points · 10 days ago
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
comment on acetate counterion is why your 10mg vial has 8.7mg of peptide in c/coa · 1 points · 14 days ago
Are you looking at area% or net peptide content? Different numbers.
comment on shortage: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/glp1aus · 5 points · 15 days ago
the regulatory compounding is the blocker
comment on [Lab] my running table: 34 tests, 11 vendors, three years in c/labresults · 2 points · 18 days ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on 24 months in and insulin syringe is still the thing I get wrong in c/reconstitution · 10 points · 22 days ago
Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.
comment on [PeptideMeter] ERP tirz 15mg — 98.4% and a very clean trace in c/labresults · 7 points · 1 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on the reconstitution question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/reconstitution · 20 points · 1 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising.
Adding to this: units is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Results] 26 weeks on 5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/reconstitution · 220 points · 1 months ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on [Below Spec] 94.1% with a 1.8% single impurity. is that the des-amido in c/labresults · 1 points · 1 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 96.2, not 96.8.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 37 weeks to accept.
comment on [Results] 26 weeks on 5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/reconstitution · 0 points · 1 months ago
Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.
comment on [Below Spec] 94.1% with a 1.8% single impurity. is that the des-amido in c/labresults · 1 points · 1 months ago
multiple batches from QYB show a spread, that is the data
comment on [PSA] New Zealand is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/glp1aus · 8 points · 1 months ago
Cite the TGA notice?
comment on the water content question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/coa · 228 points · 1 months ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
comment on Germany: water content, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 11 points · 2 months ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 40 in c/coa · 2 points · 2 months ago
the related substances line is where the story is
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 40 in c/coa · 8 points · 2 months ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with area percent, not with what you concluded.