[Lab] my running table: 34 tests, 11 vendors, three years
Genuinely asking, not being difficult.
Everyone in c/darkspot repeats that below spec is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 19 threads of people agreeing with each other.
Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?
I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.
best — the order this archive was captured in
multiple batches from SSA show a spread, that is the data
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
Was that the vendor COA or your own test?
JEEP / BPC / batch 17 / Janoshik / 97.6% — that is the shape
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
Adding to this: test results is doing more work than the comment implies.
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 4 points, both inside inter-lab variance
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
Not to be pedantic but batch and test results are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Which Medutest service and what method did they use?
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
Was that the vendor COA or your own test?
multiple batches from SGN show a spread, that is the data
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
- 1multiple batches from SSA show a spread, that is the data11 comments in this branch · started by u/marisol_moreau
- 2testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different…4 comments in this branch · started by u/kenji_kimani