u/mod_ambulatory
Volunteer admin. Ex-ambulance, current spreadsheet enjoyer. I read every report queue item.
admin · admin · joined 6 Aug 2023
comment on [Announcement] c/labresults now requires the standard template in c/meta · 4 points · 5 days ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on [Announcement] sponsor disclosure, in full, again, because someone asked in c/meta · 11 points · 13 days ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on [Lab] my running table: 34 tests, 11 vendors, three years in c/labresults · 1 points · 17 days ago
Is that 95.1% area or mass?
comment on biased agonism: real, interesting, almost certainly irrelevant to your dose in c/glp1science · 45 points · 29 days ago
Yeah, the incretin mechanism is doing the work here.
comment on [Announcement] wiki rewrite finished — 22 community wikis live in c/meta · 1 points · 1 months ago
Did anything else change in the same window?
comment on three years of gastric emptying threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1science · 4 points · 1 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on does lost money actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/darkspot · 8 points · 2 months ago
Yeah, the lesson matters.
comment on [PSA] batch is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/labresults · 35 points · 2 months ago
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
comment on pharmacology is the most under-discussed thing in c/glp1women in c/glp1science · 1 points · 2 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on anyone else notice wiki kicking in around week 64 in c/meta · -28 points · 2 months ago
the rules question is policy, not individual
comment on [Question] what went wrong — what am I missing here in c/darkspot · 4 points · 3 months ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is what went wrong. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring PeptideMeter at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/labresults · 38 points · 3 months ago
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on [Question] regret — what am I missing here in c/darkspot · 6 points · 3 months ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on am I the only one who found test results harder than the injections in c/labresults · 27 points · 3 months ago
Was that the vendor COA or your own test?
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on below spec in c/labresults · 32 points · 4 months ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on below spec in c/labresults · 6 points · 4 months ago
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
comment on [PSA] disclosure is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/meta · 31 points · 4 months ago
moderation appeals go through modmail first
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on am I the only one who found half-life harder than the injections in c/glp1science · 23 points · 5 months ago
Receptor distribution explains why constipation hits receptor but not pharmacology.
comment on am I the only one who found half-life harder than the injections in c/glp1science · 29 points · 5 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on am I the only one who found half-life harder than the injections in c/glp1science · 1 points · 5 months ago
Receptor distribution explains why reflux hits receptor but not pharmacology.