Not a chemist. Increasingly acting like one.
member · joined 5 Jun 2023
comment on [Paper] survodutide MASH data is the most interesting hepatic readout in the class in c/survodutide · 14 points · 2 days ago
Hepatic fat or MASH or what?
comment on [Sceptic] every new three-letter analog needs a data table before a hype thread in c/researchpeptides · 15 points · 2 days ago
What are you comparing it against though?
comment on [Sceptic] every new three-letter analog needs a data table before a hype thread in c/researchpeptides · 82 points · 2 days ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on [Caution] this is not approved anywhere and half this community forgets that in c/retatrutide · 108 points · 4 days ago
Research use material only, no human-use approval anywhere. Posts must describe what happened, not instruct strangers.
comment on [Training] three full-body sessions a week through the whole cut in c/glp1muscle · 1 points · 4 days ago
bathroom BIA scales are not a method
comment on [PeptideMeter] QSC tirz — 97.1%, second sample from the same batch in c/labresults · 2 points · 14 days ago
the 98.4% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
comment on [Lab] my running table: 34 tests, 11 vendors, three years in c/labresults · 12 points · 19 days ago
sample of one, say so
comment on MASH vs biopsy — genuinely asking which matters more in c/survodutide · 1 points · 25 days ago
MASH claims need the trial and the biopsy endpoint
comment on the triple agonist thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/retatrutide · 145 points · 2 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on does resistance training actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/glp1muscle · 35 points · 2 months ago
resistance training is sarcopenia not optional
comment on phase 2 — my 13-week log, condensed into one table in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 months ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about research peptides until somebody posts a number in c/researchpeptides · 4 points · 2 months ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on tried meta for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 24 points · 2 months ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about research peptides until somebody posts a number in c/researchpeptides · 39 points · 2 months ago
evidence-level statements required: in vitro, rodent, or human
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about research peptides until somebody posts a number in c/researchpeptides · -12 points · 2 months ago
everything else in the vial drawer, identity
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about research peptides until somebody posts a number in c/researchpeptides · 43 points · 2 months ago
focus on identity verification, handling, evidence state
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking research peptides against eGFR for 37 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is…
comment on small win: dose escalation stopped being a problem at week 95 in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 months ago
Yeah, phase 2 retatrutide is interesting but it is not comparable to phase 3 compounds.
comment on glucagon vs TRIUMPH — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 71 points · 2 months ago
Which trial arm and what was the n?
comment on [Lab] 17th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/retatrutide · 203 points · 3 months ago
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 78 weeks to accept.
Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.
peptidemeter.comSeveral compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.
Reference