u/kian_verhoeven

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

Yeah, glycaemic control is the original use.

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

no supplement selling, no coaching solicitation

CGM traces tell a story, numbers alone do not

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 73 weeks to accept.

the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 2 points, both inside inter-lab variance

Not to be pedantic but exit scam and PDF metadata are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag

reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations

Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.

testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts

Week 84 for me and the honest summary is: 15kg down, constipation manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

DEXA is the real measurement

You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance Adding to this: group buy is doing more work than the comment implies.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

protein targets in g/kg

This is correct. DEXA is the standard.

resistance training is sarcopenia not optional

rapid loss plus no protein equals muscle loss