[Results] 46 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring
Week 24 update. 40kg down from the start, muscle cramps basically gone since about week 64.
Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with muscle cramps.
The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering, storing, logging, remembering. Nobody mentions that the hard bit is not the drug, it is the routine.
Happy to answer anything. Please do not ask me what dose you should be on.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Crossposting this to c/bloodwork because the people who need it are not reading this community.
Crossposting this to c/bloodwork because the people who need it are not reading this community.
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
Not to be pedantic but purity and Medutest are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Tested 19 batches from TFC over 67 weeks. Spread was 99.3% to 94.2, mostly 99.3. Consistent vendor.
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
The VendorInvestigate result at 93.7% was below the 98.0% claim. SWB retested at their cost and came back 93.7%. Logged as resolved.
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
Batch number? Date of test?
the Medutest and PeptideMeter results differ by 15 points, both inside inter-lab variance
the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 10 points, both inside inter-lab variance
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 10 points, both inside inter-lab variance
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
the Medutest and PeptideMeter results differ by 19 points, both inside inter-lab variance
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
I am going to push back on this slightly.
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
multiple batches from Homopeptide show a spread, that is the data
- 1template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result17 comments in this branch · started by u/refund_ledger
- 2Crossposting this to c/bloodwork because the people who need it are not…8 comments in this branch · started by u/hedda_aguirre