GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Results] 46 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring — 68 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.1k
c/labresults·submitted 7 months ago by u/coa_janitor

[Results] 46 weeks on 10mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring

Labbranch of 8 comments

Week 24 update. 40kg down from the start, muscle cramps basically gone since about week 64. Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with muscle cramps. The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin.…

Read the full submission and all 68 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 7 months ago
u/hedda_aguirre202 points·7 months ago

Crossposting this to c/bloodwork because the people who need it are not reading this community.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ewan_marchand45 points·7 months ago

Crossposting this to c/bloodwork because the people who need it are not reading this community.

Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/valeria_girard19 points·7 months ago

Not to be pedantic but purity and Medutest are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/coa_janitorOPmod · c/coa27 points·7 months ago

Tested 19 batches from TFC over 67 weeks. Spread was 99.3% to 94.2, mostly 99.3. Consistent vendor.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_eriksen72 points·7 months ago

This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.

replysharereportpermalink
u/coa_janitorOPmod · c/coa113 points·7 months ago

The VendorInvestigate result at 93.7% was below the 98.0% claim. SWB retested at their cost and came back 93.7%. Logged as resolved.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hugo_pires30 points·7 months ago

below-spec results get logged, not dismissed

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.