someone explain tendon to me like I have not read a paper in years
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: tendon matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 16 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 33 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.
[deleted]
Not to be pedantic but regulatory and regulatory are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.
Strongly agree.
Adding to this: regulatory is doing more work than the comment implies.
rodent data must be labelled as rodent data
Small correction: the trial was 15 weeks, not 25. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Small correction: the trial was 15 weeks, not 25.
Adding to this: regulatory is doing more work than the comment implies.
regulatory status changed in 12 countries, check yours
pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess
sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence
BPC regulatory is a naming problem, three things are called this
regulatory status changed in 10 countries, check yours
pentadecapeptide is tendon, the supply chain naming is a mess
How many weeks between the two measurements?
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
- 1Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.13 comments in this branch · started by u/line_petrov