GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
508
c/bpc157·posted 7 months ago by u/marit_sandvik

tried sequence for 20 weeks. here is what happened.

Caution Clean Column ×1

Genuinely asking, not being difficult.

Everyone in c/scamalerts repeats that regulatory is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 4 threads of people agreeing with each other.

Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?

I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.

4,212 up / 3,704 down53% upvoted20 commentsid zjueky26 Dec 2025

20 comments

18 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/bpc_scepticMOD104 points·7 months ago

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

replysharereportpermalink
u/source_or_silence71 points·7 months ago

How many weeks between the two measurements?

replysharereportpermalink
u/baseline_drifteranalytical100 points·7 months ago

the tendon rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not

replysharereportpermalink
u/sofia_ferreira44 points·7 months ago·edited

How many weeks between the two measurements?

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_danquah20 points·7 months ago·edited

the regulatory rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not

replysharereportpermalink
u/vikram_mbeki83 points·7 months ago

regulatory status changed in 14 countries, check yours

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]38 points·7 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/gas_fee_grump29 points·7 months ago·edited

the sequence literature looks promising but rodent-only

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_sandvikOP55 points·7 months ago

near-zero controlled human data, full stop

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_sandvikOP47 points·7 months ago

BPC pentadecapeptide is a naming problem, three things are called this

replysharereportpermalink
u/sofia_ferreira-8 points·7 months ago

Did anything else change in the same window?

replysharereportpermalink
u/lina_novak1 point·7 months ago·edited

This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ms_fragmenter1 point·7 months ago

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_ivaturi1 point·7 months ago

the tendon literature looks promising but rodent-only

replysharereportpermalink
u/fatima_wojcik1 point·7 months ago

Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 94.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_sandvikOP1 point·7 months ago

Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 94.2.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 87 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_weiss1 point·7 months ago

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

replysharereportpermalink
u/baseline_drifteranalytical47 points·7 months ago

Genuine question — what concentration were you at?

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/bpc157

BPC-157 as it actually is: a pentadecapeptide with a genuinely interesting rodent tendon-and-gut literature, near-zero controlled human data, a naming and sequence mess in the supply chain, and a regulatory status that changed sharply in several countries.

35kmembers
62submissions
Mar 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/bpc157
c/bpc157 rules
  1. Research use only. No human protocols, no injection instructions.
  2. Rodent data must be labelled as rodent data in the body.
  3. Sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/bpc_scepticu/sequence_checkeru/rui_only_ro
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →