GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of tried sequence for 20 weeks. here is what happened. — 20 comments in the full submission. View in context.
508
c/bpc157·submitted 7 months ago by u/marit_sandvik

tried sequence for 20 weeks. here is what happened.

Cautionbranch of 10 comments

Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/scamalerts repeats that regulatory is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 4 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because…

Read the full submission and all 20 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 7 months ago
u/bpc_scepticMOD104 points·7 months ago

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

replysharereportpermalink
u/source_or_silence71 points·7 months ago

How many weeks between the two measurements?

replysharereportpermalink
u/baseline_drifteranalytical100 points·7 months ago

the tendon rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not

replysharereportpermalink
u/sofia_ferreira44 points·7 months ago·edited

How many weeks between the two measurements?

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_danquah20 points·7 months ago·edited

the regulatory rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not

replysharereportpermalink
u/vikram_mbeki83 points·7 months ago

regulatory status changed in 14 countries, check yours

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]38 points·7 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/gas_fee_grump29 points·7 months ago·edited

the sequence literature looks promising but rodent-only

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_sandvikOP55 points·7 months ago

near-zero controlled human data, full stop

replysharereportpermalink
u/marit_sandvikOP47 points·7 months ago

BPC pentadecapeptide is a naming problem, three things are called this

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/bpc157

BPC-157 as it actually is: a pentadecapeptide with a genuinely interesting rodent tendon-and-gut literature, near-zero controlled human data, a naming and sequence mess in the supply chain, and a regulatory status that changed sharply in several countries.

35kmembers
62submissions
Mar 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/bpc157
c/bpc157 rules
  1. Research use only. No human protocols, no injection instructions.
  2. Rodent data must be labelled as rodent data in the body.
  3. Sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/bpc_scepticu/sequence_checkeru/rui_only_ro
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →