someone explain lyophilised to me like I have not read a paper in years
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: lyophilised matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 4 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 11 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, data logger is the only acceptable proof.
Do you have the logger trace?
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
[removed by moderator]
data logger is the standard, gut feeling is not
Strongly agree. Peak temperature is not the whole story.
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
the logger trace is the data that matters, not the packaging promises
Yeah, data logger is the only acceptable proof.
a warm courier van is a bigger problem for a mixed vial than for dry powder
Yeah, data logger is the only acceptable proof.
Disagree on that part. 96.8% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.
- 1Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.5 comments in this branch · started by u/ines_lindqvist
- 2Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.5 comments in this branch · started by u/split_dose_sceptic