[Explainer] excursion tables, and why "it got warm" is not a data point
Right, the ice pack question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 12 data points over 22 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 45, not week 94. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Strongly agree. Peak temperature is not the whole story.
Do you have the logger trace?
Denmark to Denmark: 12 days with HJ and 19 days with BCH. Same route, different carriers, variance is real.
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
lane reports need origin, destination, carrier, and actual transit days
[removed by moderator]
no tracking numbers, no full addresses, no label photos — instant removal
France to France: 14 days with BCH and 11 days with TFC. Same route, different carriers, variance is real.
data logger is the standard, gut feeling is not
stability after excursion is not zero, it is dose-dependent
customs clearance often breaks the cold chain, factor that in
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
gel packs last 15 hours, after that you are relying on the box itself
This is correct. Dry powder is way more robust than liquid.
lane reports need origin, destination, carrier, and actual transit days
- 1Strongly agree. Peak temperature is not the whole story.12 comments in this branch · started by u/rohan_steiner