GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] telehealth is doing more work than we give it credit for — 24 comments in the full submission. View in context.
666
c/compounding·submitted 1 year ago by u/lukas_vermeulen

[Discussion] telehealth is doing more work than we give it credit for

Discussionbranch of 6 comments

Been lurking in c/trialwatch for about 16 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 67, 0.25mg, and compounding is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 13 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle. What I actually want to…

Read the full submission and all 24 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 1 year ago
u/escrow_evangelist56 points·1 year ago

The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/neha_krastev13 points·1 year ago

no pharmacy referral codes, naming is fine, recruiting is not

replysharereportpermalink
u/lukas_vermeulenOP11 points·1 year ago

Strongly agree. API source transparency matters.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yannick_barros46 points·1 year ago

Yeah, 503A and 503B are different regulatory animals.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lift_heavy_thingsresistance training23 points·1 year ago

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

replysharereportpermalink
u/controversial_only32 points·1 year ago

telehealth prescriber models exist, pricing differs by state

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/compounding

Compounded GLP-1s as a supply route: the 503A/503B distinction, the shortage-list mechanics that made compounding legal and then didn't, state board rules, telehealth prescriber models, and what a compounding pharmacy will and will not tell you about its API source.

53kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/compounding
c/compounding rules
  1. Regulatory claims need a citation to the actual rule, notice or docket.
  2. No pharmacy referral codes. Naming a pharmacy is fine; recruiting for it is not.
  3. API source questions are on-topic and pharmacies dodging them is newsworthy.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/formulary_fighteru/usp_appendixu/quiet_moderatoru/prior_auth_pain
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →