[Question] declared value — does under-declaring help or hurt
Right, the import question again, but with numbers this time. I have 6 data points over 32 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing…
always state your country, advice from another jurisdiction can harm you
Strongly agree. Jurisdiction matters.
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
Slight fix: the number was 98.1, not 98.0. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
no advice on evading inspection or misdeclaring
Slight fix: the number was 98.1, not 98.0.
Adding to this: jurisdiction is doing more work than the comment implies.
research-use documentation is not a magic word