unpopular opinion: dose history is massively overrated
Week 9 update. 10kg down from the start, early fullness basically gone since about week 49.
Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with early fullness.
The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering, storing, logging, remembering. Nobody mentions that the hard bit is not the drug, it is the routine.
Happy to answer anything. Please do not ask me what dose you should be on.
best — the order this archive was captured in
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
This is correct. Long-term logs matter.
Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
consistency is harder than the dose change
Week 7 for me and the honest summary is: 35kg down, sulphur burps manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
one log per person, update it, do not repost
one log per person, update it, do not repost
Adding to this: tracking is doing more work than the comment implies.
dose, date, weight, waist, fatigue, labs
the 88 week mark is where it gets interesting
Week 7 for me and the honest summary is: 35kg down, sulphur burps manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
consistency is harder than the dose change
- 1Week 7 for me and the honest summary is: 35kg down, sulphur burps…7 comments in this branch · started by u/step_therapy_s
- 2I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry…4 comments in this branch · started by u/karl_fischer_kev