[PSA] shortage is not what most of this community thinks it is
Right, the TGA question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 9 data points over 38 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 23, not week 72. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Yeah, the 2024 rule change was sudden.
[removed by moderator]
Small correction: the trial was 12 weeks, not 10. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
the regulatory shortage is the blocker
Small correction: the trial was 12 weeks, not 10.
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
Small correction: the trial was 15 weeks, not 34. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
unfunded-means-full-price is the NZ reality
PBS listings change the cost completely
This is correct. PBS listings matter.
the 2024 compounding rule change closed a major route overnight
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
TGA watches change monthly, follow the list
What is the PBS status?
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with PBS, not with what you concluded.
PBS listings change the cost completely
PBS/TGA claims need the notice or schedule entry
- 1the 2024 compounding rule change closed a major route overnight9 comments in this branch · started by u/camila_sandvik
- 2Yeah, the 2024 rule change was sudden.8 comments in this branch · started by u/zeynep_ndiaye