[Results] 26 weeks on 15mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring
Quick one. Canada here.
EMA works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.
Specifics: the route I used took 20 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.
Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
The nausea was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
pricing posts need date and currency
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
reimbursement costs in the UK this month
Yeah, EU rules is usually national rules.
Strongly agree. Pricing is local.
Not to be pedantic but prescription and EU are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
Yeah, EU rules is usually national rules.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
apotheke, receta, Apotheke — twenty-seven different answers
batch number?
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
private and public prescription routes differ
- 1batch number?8 comments in this branch · started by u/gastric_emptying_g
- 2Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different…4 comments in this branch · started by u/greta_nilsen