5 months in and protein is still the thing I get wrong
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: resistance training matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 16 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 29 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
FFMI tracking requires body composition
The constipation was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
resistance training is sarcopenia not optional
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
- 1Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell…4 comments in this branch · started by u/diego_iyer