Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] can we stop arguing about FFMI until somebody posts a number — 30 comments in the full submission. View in context.
611
[Discussion] can we stop arguing about FFMI until somebody posts a number
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: resistance training matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 14 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 31 people…
Yeah, protein matters on rapid loss.
What was the batch number and which service?
resistance training is sarcopenia not optional
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
sarcopenia is the unsolved question
sarcopenia is the unsolved question
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.