GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
-50
c/glp1muscle·posted 6 months ago by u/tomas_broberg

am I the only one who found protein harder than the injections

Data

Right, the protein question again, but with numbers this time.

I have 22 data points over 14 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.

The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 75, not week 29. People give up long before the interesting part.

Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.

142 up / 192 down43% upvoted11 commentsid 3gtwj116 Jan 2026

11 comments

11 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/maren_ibarra11 points·6 months ago

Yeah, protein matters on rapid loss.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]8 points·6 months ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/sanne_novak7 points·6 months ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sunday_shot_sal0 points·6 months ago

Yeah, protein matters on rapid loss.

Adding to this: DEXA is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/throwaway_titration8 points·6 months ago

resistance training is sarcopenia not optional

replysharereportpermalink
u/sarcopenia_watchMOD4 points·6 months ago

Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rina_nascimento3 points·6 months ago

bathroom BIA scales are not a method

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (2) →
u/throwaway_wl2026-21 points·6 months ago

This is correct. DEXA is the standard.

replysharereportpermalink
u/viktor_girard1 point·6 months ago·edited

Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 97.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/glp1muscle

Lean-mass retention during rapid weight loss: protein targets, resistance-training minimums, DEXA and BIA measurement reality, FFMI tracking, and the sarcopenia question that nobody funded a proper trial for.

30kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/glp1muscle rules
  1. Body-composition claims need a method. Bathroom BIA scales are not a method.
  2. Protein targets in g/kg, not "lots".
  3. No supplement selling, no coaching solicitation.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.