anyone else notice mechanism kicking in around week 70
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: mechanism matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 22 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 7 people measuring the same…
Is that mechanism or speculation?
cite the paper: journal, year, first author, links optional
Small correction: the trial was 3 weeks, not 32. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
mechanistic speculation is welcome if flaired as speculation
Slight fix: the number was 96.8, not 99.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.