GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
2k
c/glp1science·posted 1 year ago by u/annika_fonseca

[Results] 32 weeks, 31kg, and pharmacology was the hard part

Question Clean Column ×1 Sourced ×3

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.

I have been tracking mechanism against triglycerides for 25 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.

Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.

tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.

2,557 up / 563 down82% upvoted45 commentsid 1xg4co24 Sep 2024

45 comments

18 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/bastian_ekstrom118 points·1 year ago
that is the funniest sentence i have read on this site
replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]87 points·1 year ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/slow_logbook81 points·1 year ago·edited

Yeah, the incretin mechanism is doing the work here.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kavya_kravchenko-33 points·1 year ago

Where does the appetite data actually come from?

replysharereportpermalink
u/viktor_girard82 points·1 year ago
genuine question, not being difficult: how do you know
replysharereportpermalink
u/gastric_emptying_gMOD60 points·1 year ago

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

replysharereportpermalink
u/aksel_palacios57 points·1 year ago

Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_lindqvist42 points·1 year ago

Mechanistically the bit that matters is gastric emptying. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yusuf_ramos12 points·1 year ago

Mechanistically the bit that matters is gastric emptying.

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →
u/amara_dziedzic27 points·1 year ago

amylin is not GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected

replysharereportpermalink
u/santiago_rasmussen13 points·1 year ago

amylin is not GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected

Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/analog_alphabet30 points·1 year ago

Strongly agree. Central appetite is real but people overstate it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/annika_fonsecaOP22 points·1 year ago

Rodent, human, or in vitro?

replysharereportpermalink
u/employer_carveout35 points·1 year ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/priya_guerrero28 points·1 year ago

amylin is not GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected

replysharereportpermalink
u/runa_cabrera17 points·1 year ago

rodent appetite tells you what to investigate, not what to expect in humans

replysharereportpermalink
u/flair_enthusiast25 points·1 year ago

glucagon-receptor contribution is incretin for dual and triple agonism

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/glp1science

The mechanism layer: incretin physiology, receptor distribution, gastric emptying, central appetite signalling, glucagon-receptor contribution, amylin co-agonism, and the pharmacokinetics that make weekly dosing possible. Papers get cited by journal and year or they get a [needs source] reply.

50kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/glp1science rules
  1. Cite the paper: journal, year, first author. Links optional, citation mandatory.
  2. Mechanistic speculation is welcome if flaired as speculation.
  3. No extrapolating rodent data to human dosing without saying that is what you are doing.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.